Practical examples of how these strategies can be implemented are provided to guide researchers interested in conducting rigorous case study research. But, these quality benchmarks do not apply in qualitative research, so how is it that we create rigor in qualitative studies? researcher begins to blend in; respondents feel comfortable disclosing informaton that no longer 'tows the party-line'), The researcher can rise above his or her own preconceptions. prolonged engagement, persistent observation, and triangulation (Lincoln & Guba, 1985). (Graneheim & Lundman, 2004). In other words, the more the researcher can do to make the inquiry trustworthy, the more likely it is that readers will be persuaded to read on. All three of these factors were used to increase the credibility of this study. %%EOF
FALSE TRUE or FALSE: In terms of confirmability, you want to prove that your qualitative research is neutral and not influenced by the assumptions or biases of the researchers. Progressive subjectivity checking is a technique whereby a researcher archives their changing expectations and assumptions for a study. In his article, he discusses how a researcher who conducts qualitative interviews should be self-aware and self-reflective, being aware of bias and compensating for it rather than trying to eliminate it. These expectations might include a priori and emerging constructions or interpretations of what is being learned or what is going on. To provide examples of a qualitative multiple case study to illustrate the specific strategies that can be used to ensure the credibility, dependability, confirmability and transferability of a study. endstream
endobj
221 0 obj
<>stream
Br J Pain. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. PDF Rigor in Qualitative research: Promoting quality in Social Science Research Bethesda, MD 20894, Web Policies This holds true for all research, not just qualitative inquiry. Lincoln and Guba (1986) proposed the criterion of transferability as the qualitative research analog to external validity as defined in quantitative research methods. C`i$#0:2CHtj9af).?^xn}7mly~QunMi?,ir]8/V+^^%/.L0aqHYmo}}Yrh1. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the Epub 2011 May 25. "Qualitative Research Guidelines Project." 2020 Feb;14(1):14-22. doi: 10.1177/2049463719854471. Credibility might be thought of as the correspondence or fit between qualitative research participants own perspectives and how these are portrayed or represented by researchers in their findings or results sections (Nowell et al., 2017). 18 0 obj endobj Rather than producing facts and figureslike the hard lines of a drawingit gives color to your customers experiences and provides context by exploring the how and why behind concepts or theories in question.
Indeed, this is a question that researchers have discussed and debated in great depth, with some suggesting that qualitative research is soft science if science at all. In any case, be diligent to leave behind an audit trail of this work, which means having documentation of all debriefings and meetings used in the generation process.. Bookshelf Rather, you should accept the fact that you are a unique individual, with a unique set of perceptions, beliefs, knowledge, and yes, biasesthose biases come from the unique set of experiences that defines you as a person. A Review of the Quality Indicators of Rigor in Qualitative Research understand quality and rigor in qualitative research. 2020 Jan;30(2):196-204. doi: 10.1177/1049732319860267. That is to say, a period long . bpDe) This review aims to identify and synthesise evidence relating to the acceptability of actigraphic . The narrative research trail: values of ambiguity and relationships. Negative case analysis: This refers to the active search for negative instances in the data, which you use to then adjust your analysis until such negative instances are eliminated (Lincoln & Guba, 1986, p. 77). Phenomenologic research as a theoretic initiative in community health nursing. Robinson, O. C. (2014). Determining how much time is sufficient depends upon the setting. These phenomena might be behavioral patterns one can observe or perspectives that a researcher can learn about through interviews. This paper examines the latter, principally as we have been intrigued by the opposing viewpoints of nurse scholars regarding this matter. The danger here is that researchers might approach qualitative research with a means-oriented mindset, wherein they apply qualitative methodologies inappropriately to problems that they are not equipped to solve, thereby overstepping the limits of the paradigm and failing the incommensurability test. The observer should be there long enough to: For more information on ethnography click here. Others have argued, however, that subjectivity pervades human perception and cognition, and that although surveys yield numerical results that seem reassuringly objective, the conversion of human perception and experience to quantified variables is an inherently subjective process (Patton, 2014). %PDF-1.7
%
Prolonged Engagement. Thus, readers must be the ones to determine whether the qualitative inquiry is transferable, not the researcher. Prolonged engagement at a site is "to test . Prolonged engagement in the field, maintaining a journal and member checks (participant feedback) can help with this. If you decide to take a qualitative research approach in your research, you need to plan carefully and essentially, have every single step mapped out before you even begin. Meaningfulness is the expectation that a study will address a worthwhile problem or issue, and if it doesn't, then it is not worth doing. Participants should also be given anonymity in any reports, and there should be no indications that participants were treated with disrespect or cruelty. Thats a lot to learn in one fell swoop! The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). I then make recommendations for the appropriate use of the strategies recommended to achieve rigor: prolonged engagement, persistent observation, and thick, rich description; inter-rater reliability, negative case analysis; peer review or debriefing; clarifying researcher bias; member checking; external audits; and triangulation. Development of rapport andtrustfacilitates understanding and co-construction of meaning betweenresearcher and members of a setting. Researchers would be engaged in the site, with the participants, as well as with the external influences as these There is definitely a place in the world for opinion pieces, but if you are setting out to conduct research, you need to take measures to faithfully represent the viewpoints you have proposed to explore (i.e., your participants viewpoints). would have deviated from the established reasoning and methods proposed in the study.